Gaining Perspective on the Real Estate Cycle.
6.19.2008
80% Down on Condo's May Spell B-A-R-G-A-I-N for Buyers
The arrival of new lending rules may begin to change that trend, and bring similar woes that have struck the detached home market to the attached segment. Because of the effect foreclosures have had on associations (in states like Florida or California), Condominium values are particularly subject to volatility in value. When a buyer's cost for a property includes a downpayment, mortgage payment, property tax (or monthly escrow), and monthly association dues, that lattermost aspect is integral to deciding how much one can afford. If an owner in foreclosure is skipping out on association dues, the difference needs to be ether a.) picked up by other dues payers (that cost is distributed amongst the others), or b.) ammentities need to be eliminated, and the overall "attractiveness" of that condo declines. Knowing this, and wanting to avoid the mistakes made in places like Miami, lenders see 80% loan-to-value ratios (20% downpayments) as the solution.
I know, I know, this is BAD news for sellers. But FHA mortgages are an exception. If your condo can be approved as an FHA property, and pass FHA inspection, then buyers can mortgage up to 97% of the value (ok, someone might be able to do 100% for you, you never know). This does not change the effect that the new rules have on values. The less buyers can afford, the less you can sell for.
For buyers, however, they will soon be seeing this "play out" in the form of falling condo prices. While we're all brainwashed into believing that prices are lower across the board, condos have not made the same kind of adjustment in the Chicagoland area as have detached homes, and that may be changing shortly...
5.07.2008
Are 1st Floor Master Bedrooms Any HOTTER than the Rest of the Market?
Figure 1
On the other side of the coin, in Detached Homes, the entire market has been far from in-check during the market's decline. As seen below, in Figure 2, the FFMH and NFFH markets are at 4 to 1 and 3 to 1 ratios of inventory to demand. With a gross 798 actively for-sale homes of the NFFH variety, and 166 with first floor masters, buyers are in the drivers seat of the entire detached home marketplace.
Figure 2
4.30.2008
Condo's/Townhomes Vs. Detached Homes
St. Charles Attached Market Times
Why is this happening? Three factors are at play- lower prices for attached properties put them within the reach of cautious first time homebuyers; todays buyer is looking for a more "move-in ready" home - less tolerance for major renovations that often come with older single family detached homes; and buyers often do not have time to do the yardwork and maintenance that goes along with a detached home. Today's buyer is changing, which has affected families and individuals selling their homes. With the challenges of being a "move-up" buyer in this market, first time buyers are a major driving force, despite the drastic reduction in their ranks due to the extinction of many high risk loan instruments that brought more first timers into the buying process than ever before.
[note: Market time statistics are problematic because of real estate agents cancelling or expiring property listings, and then re-listing them the same day. This is done in order to reintroduce a property to the "hotsheet." This is part of the reason that I utilize absorption statistics to indicate realistic expected market times.]
4.21.2008
How are Chicagoland's Condos & Townhouses Selling?
Those of you wondering what makes a buyers market versus a sellers market? Absorption rates of well over 6 months should tell you that it is a buyers market. It is a buyers market in much of Chicagoland, but not all areas are created equal.
I've picked one community from North, Northwest, West, Near West, South West, and South Suburbs, as well as a popular Chicagoland neighborhood just outside of the loop. You will notice that the market has improved from the winter's heavy saturation, but pay close attention to where 2008 March statistics are in contrast to March of 2007. Just click on the graphs to see each one in greater detail. I sampled Evanston, Schaumburg, St. Charles, Oak Park, Naperville, Orland Park, and Lincoln Park.

Evanston

Schaumburg

St. Charles

Oak Park

Naperville

Orland Park
Lincoln Park
What should we make of all of this? It tells me that there is a looming reduction in list prices and selling prices coming out of the near west suburbs, and the southwestern suburbs.
Theory: Based on the perspective that the "epicenter" of values resides in Chicagoland's city limits, one assumes that prices become lower the further away one travels from Chicago. If one area has a higher inventory to be worked off, then prices will drop, causing the next-furthest area to experience a stagnation in sales. Then as that area accumulates inventory, sellers recognize the need to reduce prices. As they act, inventory drops, and the process continues. As an area further out drops in price and experiences a wave of inventory absorption, the desirability of the closer area then diminishes, as a longer distance from the "epicenter" becomes acceptable to homebuyers. This eventually causes the process to start over again - inventory builds at the epicenter, prices drop, and as buyers eventually reach their limit to how far they will live from the epicenter, they decide that as prices in the epicenter reach a lower level, justification for the still more expensive, but closer, purchase arises once more.
Absorption is just below the 6 month mark in Lincoln Park, and around the Northern and Western collars of Chicagoland it is hovering at or around 6 months. It remains at higher levels in the near west and southwest suburbs. Based on this ideology, it would seem that near-west suburbs may experience a period of depreciation, with the farther western and southwestern suburbs then experiencing a greater increase in inventory.
Is Chicagoland moving towards Milwaukee? Is Joliet and Kendall County growth justifying a Peotone Airport & subsequent Southwest suburban buildup? These trends strike down any notion regarding "The Loop" as the epicenter for real estate values, and the movement of values based on proximity to downtown Chicago. Any idiot knows that values vary drastically across the north and south sides of Chicagoland. If that is the case, then are these areas independent of one another in their progression through the real estate cycle?


